W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: Must PROPPATCH operation be atomic...

From: John Stracke <francis@appoint.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:10:54 +0000
Message-ID: <36D1737E.68EF5580@appoint.net>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Imran Khan wrote:

> Can't I do "besteffort" vs. "atomic" in case of PROPPATCH? Because in
> my application scenario I am trying to replace the current protocol
> that allows besteffort as well as atomic flexibility.

If the client wants best-effort semantics, it can make multiple
requests.

--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke       | My opinions are my own |S/MIME & HTML OK |
|francis@appoint.net|==========================================|
|Chief Scientist    |NT's lack of reliability is only surpassed|
|Appoint.Net, Inc.  | by its lack of scalability. -- John Kirch|
\==============================================================/
Received on Monday, 22 February 1999 10:09:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:49 GMT