Yaron Goland wrote: > ... > As for why we have the atomicity requirement please refer to the section > entitled "<"This is another fine protocol you've gotten me into!">" in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1998OctDec/0303.html. I > believe the second paragraph exactly answers your question. Although it > seems that my comment regarding compliance with the atomicity requirement is > wrong. Most folks apparently have implemented it. I think that rocks! I will > eventually have to update the WebDAV book of why to reflect this. mod_dav is going to have it RSN, too. Unfortunately, it is a bit tougher... I don't have a nice transactional DB or an easy language such as Python :-( ... (interesting note: both PyDAV and Zope are written using Python(!)). Anyways, the work was started in 0.9.8 and rollback should be implemented in mod_dav 0.9.9. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/Received on Saturday, 17 April 1999 03:18:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:11 GMT