The performance ramifications of requiring hand copying are too horrific to consider. I don't believe this is a viable alternative. > -----Original Message----- > From: John Stracke [mailto:francis@netscape.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 31, 1998 2:11 PM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: Re: Don't copy live properties > > > Yaron Goland wrote: > > > I think it is too soon for us to make this judgement. I am > willing to bet > > that once we ban copying live properties we will find out > that this too > > breaks many scenarios. > > Mmm, but those scenarios can probably be addressed by having > the client copy > the properties by hand: a sequence of COPY, PROPFIND, > PROPPATCH will provide > the same behavior as the current spec. > > -- > /====================================================================\ > |John (Francis) Stracke |My opinions are my own. | The cheapest, | > |Software Retrophrenologist|========================/ fastest, & most| > |Netscape Comm. Corp. |reliable components of a computer system | > |francis@netscape.com |are those that aren't there.--Gordon Bell| > \====================================================================/ > >Received on Thursday, 31 December 1998 19:48:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:48 GMT