W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 1998

Re: Optional Backpointers from Targets to References

From: Jim Amsden <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 11:03:24 -0400
To: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5040100022612384000002L042*@MHS>
The client applications using backpointers know what the property is and that
it is a live property supported by the particular server. Clients that don't
use backpointers would ignore or just not use the property even though that
particular server was maintaining them. This is typical of any client
application that uses some specific meta-data of its own. The only thing unique
is that the server is maintaining it as a live property.





w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org on 09/17/98 04:29:50 PM
Please respond to w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
cc:
Subject: Re: Optional Backpointers from Targets to References

Jim Amsden wrote:

> But client applications relying on the option won't interoperate with servers
> that don't support it, so there isn't interoperability across WebDAV servers.
I
> suggest a better solution is for those servers built on repository managers
> that can or need to support backpointers likely have specific client
> applications that choose to use them.

Choke.  And what happens when one of these clients tries to coexist with a
client
that doesn't support backpointers?

--
/====================================================================\
|John (Francis) Stracke    |My opinions are my own.|S/MIME supported |
|Software Retrophrenologist|=========================================|
|Netscape Comm. Corp.      |There are footprints on the moon.  No    |
|francis@netscape.com      | feet, just footprints.                  |
\====================================================================/
New area code for work number: 650
Received on Friday, 18 September 1998 11:00:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:47 GMT