Re: Optional Backpointers from Targets to References

Jim Amsden wrote:

> This will require ACLs on individual properties,

Nope.  The backpointer update doesn't have to pass through the same code path as
PROPPATCH; it can call directly into the code that PROPPATCH calls, but bypass the
ACL check.

>> I don't believe that has to be a problem.  The ACLs can be set up so that they
>> specifically permit the backpointer property to be updated by the server.
>
--
/====================================================================\
|John (Francis) Stracke    |My opinions are my own.|S/MIME supported |
|Software Retrophrenologist|=========================================|
|Netscape Comm. Corp.      |The good are innocent and create justice.|
|francis@netscape.com      |The bad are guilty, and invent mercy.    |
\====================================================================/
New area code for work number: 650