W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 1998

RE: v6: 102 Processing and Status-URI

From: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 15:18:01 -0800
Message-ID: <3FF8121C9B6DD111812100805F31FC0D0113C6E9@red-msg-59.dns.microsoft.com>
To: "'Jim Davis'" <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Please refer to section 10.1 of RFC 2068 for a full explanation of what 1xx
series response codes are and how they work. It fully and completely answers
your question.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jim Davis [SMTP:jdavis@parc.xerox.com]
> Sent:	Saturday, January 24, 1998 2:05 PM
> To:	w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject:	v6: 102 Processing and Status-URI
> Do we still need 102 Processing?   Can *any* method return 102?  or only
> some?  If only some, then those that can return it should list it the list
> of possible status codes.  If all can, then there should be some language
> that says that the list of status codes with each DAV method is not
> exhaustive.
> The explanation isn't sufficient to understand how 102 works.  An example
> would help.  I mean, I can guess, and I might guess right, but I might
> guess wrong, too.
> If I do e.g., a MOVE, and get back 102 Processing, will I eventually get a
> MultiStatus?  Will I get a stream of 102s every 20 seconds or so, until I
> get that 207?
Received on Saturday, 24 January 1998 18:18:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:16 UTC