- From: Martin J. Dürst <mduerst@ifi.unizh.ch>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 12:56:04 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: Yaron Goland <yarong@microsoft.com>
- cc: "'Andre van der Hoek'" <andre@bigtime.cs.colorado.edu>, slein@wrc.xerox.com, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
On Wed, 27 Aug 1997, Yaron Goland wrote: > I don't see how we avoid that particular solution if we are going to use > the HTTP protocol. With versioning we had a clean slate, the http > protocol has nothing to say on the topic. The only mention was the > content-version header and that has been removed from the spec. The same > can not be said for variants where HTTP has some very specific things to > say on the subject. We are very constrained in this area and we must > address how those constraints effect DAV. We are indeed somewhat constrained. But as you say, we must *address* how those constraints effect DAV. Throwing any mention of it out of the requirements draft is an easy-way-out non- solution. Regards, Martin.
Received on Thursday, 28 August 1997 06:57:45 UTC