RE: Partial Puts

Sorry... hehehe.. I meant Violent not Violate. Either way, it appears we
agree.
	Yaron

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Gregory J. Woodhouse [SMTP:gjw@wnetc.com]
> Sent:	Friday, March 21, 1997 1:28 PM
> To:	Yaron Goland
> Cc:	'masinter@parc.xerox.com'; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject:	RE: Partial Puts
> 
> On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Yaron Goland wrote:
> 
> > Gregory, given this post and my response to Larry's original post,
> can I
> > assume we are in violate agreement about how to proceed with partial
> > PUT?
> > 	Yaron
> > 
> 
> Violate agreement? That's an interesting concept. Does that mean
> there's a
> proposed standard we both think shouldn't be followed?
> 
> Seriously, though, I think we basically agree here.
> 
> 
> ---
> gjw@wnetc.com    /    http://www.wnetc.com/home.html
> If you're going to reinvent the wheel, at least try to come
> up with a better one.