W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1996

Re: non-HTML resources in webdav spec

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 00:24:51 PST
To: gjw@wnetc.com
CC: kt@nttlabs.com, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-Id: <96Nov13.002451pst."2694"@golden.parc.xerox.com>
# I like this idea. In fact, I've been experimenting with the idea of using
# multipart/related in another context to transfer database records. My only
# question is whether the experimental status of the RFC will pose a problem
# for us. If so, what do we need to do?

The MHTML group has pushed multipart/related into standards track,
since they needed it for mailing around HTML documents with the
included GIFs and JPEGs. There are new versions in the internet drafts

To: Multiple recipients <LISTSERV@segate.sunet.se>
cc: mhtml@segate.sunet.se
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Last Call: MIME E-mail Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents,
         such as HTML (MHTML) to Proposed Standard
Reply-to: iesg@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 07:07:12 PST

 The IESG has received a request from the MIME Encapsulation of
 Aggregate HTML Documents Working Group to consider the following three
 documents for the  status of Proposed Standard:

 1. MIME E-mail Encapsulation of Aggregate Documents, such as HTML

 2. Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource Locators

 3. The MIME Multipart/Related Content-type

 The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
 final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
 iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by November 18, 1996.

 Files can be obtained via ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/<filename>

------- End of forwarded message -------
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 1996 03:25:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:14 UTC