RE: Comments: DAV Specification 0.2

Now that is totally unacceptable. If we are going to consider it as part
of this document then it must be publicly available. For the moment it
is just a place holder for "some sort of generic hierarchical format."
One day when the spec hits version 1 (not 0.1, 0.2, or the upcoming 0.3)
we will either have a reference or we will create our own.

			Yaron

>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Jim Whitehead [SMTP:ejw@ics.uci.edu]
>Sent:	Tuesday, November 12, 1996 6:53 PM
>To:	w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
>Subject:	RE: Comments: DAV Specification 0.2
>
>Corprew Reed wrote:
>>The current specification for WebMaps/SiteMaps and other
>>proposals should be included in the references section of the draft.
>
>Agreed.  There is a slight issue here, in that the latest *Map proposal is
>currently behind the W3C Member firewall.  If you are interested in getting
>access to this spec., my understanding is that I can arrange for members of
>this working group to have access to it.  Send me email for more details.
>
>- Jim
>
>