W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 1996

Opinion on Notify Request Header

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@ics.uci.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 17:36:33 -0800
Message-Id: <aea0550b0f0210042f80@[128.195.21.209]>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

I am interested in the group's opinion on the Notify Request header
proposal in Section 6.  Do you think this is a good idea, or a bad idea?
Server implementors -- how difficult would such a mechanism be to
implement?

>6. Notify Request Header (proposal, for comment)
>
>Whenever the NotifyRequest header is included in an HTTP request, the
>server should send update information on the progress of a request.
>
>Notify_Request = "NotifyRequest" ":"
>
>It is common, in asynchronous environments, to provide a mechanism to
>describe the status of a request as it is processed. As we provide for
>more and more powerful methods, which have longer and longer processing
>times, might we not want a similar feature for HTTP?

Thanks!

- Jim
Received on Friday, 1 November 1996 20:39:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:41 GMT