Whoops! Cut and paste one character short... -- Alan O. Freier Corporate Cynic <freier@netscape.com> (415) 937-3638 (work)
attached mail follows:
The original message was received at Thu, 19 Sep 1996 11:43:21 -0700 from localhost [127.0.0.1] ----- The following addresses had delivery problems ----- <w3c-dist-auth@w3.or> (unrecoverable error) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 550 <w3c-dist-auth@w3.or>... Host unknown (Name server: w3.or: host not found) ----- Original message follows -----
attached mail follows:
Here's the definition of HMAC for those that are interested. HMAC = <hash>(key XOR pad1 + <hash>(key XOR pad2 + data)) replace <hash> with whatever (MD5, SHA, etc) pad1 and pad2 are well-known (ie, documented) It's really just a combination of known items in such a way that the security of the result does not rely on the <hash> involved having a strong "collision intractable" property. In my opinion, the pending downfall of MD5 is probably overplayed, and its use in HMAC is perfectly acceptable. But those who play devil's advocate roles in front of less enlightened audiences might use this argument against emerging technologies. Fighting such mischief is a time consuming hassle. AO -- Alan O. Freier Corporate Cynic <freier@netscape.com> (415) 937-3638 (work)Received on Thursday, 19 September 1996 18:04:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:41 GMT