W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > May 2009

Re: URI Template experience

From: Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:24:02 -0400
Message-ID: <3f1451f50905220724q1aab44c9pe59cff2893cf3c16@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: URI <uri@w3.org>
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Your question implies that the features in the current draft are
> somehow dependent on the extent to which the current draft has
> been implemented in the wild.  I think that is backwards, since
> the draft received many comments and did not change as a result.
> For example,
>
> http://www.w3.org/mid/07109D44-233D-42F3-ACB0-56B4A6562903@gbiv.com
>
> So, the answer to your question is that implementors are patiently
> waiting (perhaps too patiently) for the draft to be updated.
> Would it help if I issued a draft with the alternative syntax?

I asked the question because there are a bunch of implementations and if
there was a great attraction to the current syntax beyond {foo} then I wanted
to know that. From what I can tell from the ensuing conversation there is a need
for more complex capabilities beyond {foo}, but no one is in love with
the current
syntax. That's good news to me because I prefer your proposed system.

I can update the current draft to your proposal, or you can generate
a draft yourself if you think that will go faster.

   Thanks,
   -joe

>
> ....Roy
>



-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 14:24:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:42 GMT