Ian Hickson scripsit: > > So this is an IRI, no URI, and invalid in document types permitting only > > URIs. > > Well there's no question that it's invalid, the question is what should > browsers do with it. The href values you have shown us *are* valid IRIs. It's that browsers transform them to URIs using a different and incompatible set of conventions from RFC 3987. Since part of the purpose of HTML5 is to retrospectively document browser behavior, it is entirely appropriate that this non-3987 mapping be documented there. -- Work hard, John Cowan play hard, cowan@ccil.org die young, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan rot quickly.Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2008 04:56:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:41 GMT