W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Comments on draft-duerst-mailto-bis-04.txt, please

From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 02:36:11 -0500
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Cc: uri@w3.org, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, jwz@jwz.org
Message-ID: <20080106073611.GA23161@mercury.ccil.org>

Martin Duerst scripsit:

> In particular, the current spec for mailto:, RFC 2368, contains
> some advice against using a bcc field in a mailto: URI, but this
> doesn't seem to be followed, and we were unable to find any reason,
> so we removed it. Comments on this (both positive and negative,
> if possible with reasons) would be appreciated.

The whole point of bcc: is to keep certain recipients secret,
but if they are exposed in the mailto: URL, they are hardly
a secret any more, eh?

-- 
John Cowan   cowan@ccil.org    http://ccil.org/~cowan
The known is finite, the unknown infinite; intellectually we stand
on an islet in the midst of an illimitable ocean of inexplicability.
Our business in every generation is to reclaim a little more land,
to add something to the extent and the solidity of our possessions.
        --Thomas Henry Huxley
Received on Sunday, 6 January 2008 07:36:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:40 GMT