- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:31:48 -0800
- To: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- CC: uri@w3.org
The next step is to iterate through a few versions of the I-D then see if there is enough interest/consensus in pursuing either a Standards Track or Experimental RFC. For Standards Track, we need at least two demonstratably interoperable implementations and an obvious consensus that what we're putting forward for standardization is technically complete with no significant issues. Given that this is an individual submission (i.e. it's not the product of a working group) then the process for moving forward through the process is rather informal and moves along at whatever pace the authors want to move it along. - James Mike Schinkel wrote: > Hi all, > > As I'm unfamiliar with processes regarding the IETF, may I ask the status on > URI Templates? Is the next step for it to become an RFC? What is required > for it to become a "recommendation" or a "standard", and when is that > expected (assuming it is expected?) > > Thanks for helping a newbie understand the process. > > -Mike Schinkel > http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ > http://www.welldesignedurls.org/ > > P.S. URI Template *rocks*! > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 22:19:04 UTC