> You are suggesting it's no problem for one speaker group to be able > to tag things with addr-spec values that plainly say "this is > mine" The appearance of an addr-spec value in a tag URI does not "plainly say" any such thing. It's merely a convenient way of making sure there are no conflicts. This came up in the discussion of the "tag" URI, although the point isn't as clear as it could be in the actual document. There is no "resolution" process. They are just unique IDs. They're more readable than UUIDs, but it doesn't mean that they are readable text. And "Author's 48 hours" isn't really the right time to re-raise this issue. I think the document in the RFC editor queue is just fine as is. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.netReceived on Thursday, 13 October 2005 18:29:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:48 GMT