W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > October 2005

RE: RFC 2822 email addresses in tag URIs

From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:47:06 -0400
Message-Id: <p06110401bf7405f47ab2@[]>
To: uri@w3.org

>  > It's at a very early stage, and I won't bet that it flies in
>>  the next years, but OTOH it would be a bad plan if you limit
>>  tag URLs _unnecessarily_ in a way that cannot work with future
>>  I18N Mail Addresses (= IMA).
>I don't think it is a "bad plan" to limit Tag URIs to only
>allow a relatively limited set of email addresses, as long as
>it is easy for anyone to obtain an email address of the required

Tim is suggesting we limit the range of addr-spec allowed in 'tag' URIs
so that they are legible.

You are suggesting it's no problem for one speaker group to be able
to tag things with addr-spec values that plainly say "this is mine" and
others to be limited to marking things with inscrutable Romanji machine

For the latter groups, this scheme would offer no advantages over
a hash such as provided in the opaquelocktoken scheme.  For the
elect, it gives tags that are friendly names, too.

Think about it.


Received on Thursday, 13 October 2005 12:47:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:09 UTC