At 11:02 AM +0100 9/24/04, Charles Lindsey wrote: >Well presumably 2369bis provides the default for _any_ syntax not >defined more specifically by some scheme. So yes, and maybe even >with the sentence you suggest. Good. >But I am still curious as to how SASL suthentication is intended to >be managed in this and other schemes, and whether we need anything >like Al's 'snews' scheme. That's a separate document with different intent than this one. --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail ConsortiumReceived on Friday, 24 September 2004 14:57:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:34 GMT