W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > May 2004

Re: removing constraints on 'resource' [024-identity]

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:01:38 -0700
Message-Id: <A502C914-AF68-11D8-AB89-000A95A51C9E@textuality.com>
Cc: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@gbiv.com>, uri@w3.org
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
On May 25, 2004, at 1:31 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:

>     Resource
>        Anything that has been named or described can be a resource.

>    Resource
>        This document doesn't limit the scope of what might be a
>        'resource'; rather, the term 'resource' is used for whatever it
>        is that a Uniform Resource Identifier identifies;

I do *not* support the change away from "has been."  There is too much 
room for argument without practical import as to what might or might 
not be a resource, but on the other hand if it already has been named 
or described, there's not doubt at all that it could be a resource.

BTW, Larry's wording does a much better job of describing how I think 
about resources and how I describe them to people than the existing 
draft wording.  Not that I think that the current wording is wrong or 
that they are inconsistent; I just think Larry's is clearer and 
friendlier and less likely to cause people to wrinkle their foreheads 
and think "WTF?" -Tim

Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2004 19:01:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC