- From: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 23:49:24 -0400
- To: uri@w3.org
I think we can agree that we don't want any duplications in the standards track list of schemes. Tony Hansen tony+uri@maillennium.att.com Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote: > > At 8:05 PM -0700 8/8/04, Larry Masinter wrote: > >> * Revising RFC 2717 and 2718 >> Tony Hansen and Ted Hardie will create a new document which >> replaces these, but with the idea that non-standards-track >> scheme registration will be much easier, with the main purpose >> to avoid duplicates. > > There was a fair amount of disagreement about that last clause. A few of > us (at least Leslie Daigle and I) thought that allowing duplicates but > documenting the registrants of each would cause less problems for the > registry, and still allow legit developers to pick a good new name, than > trying to come up with a single-entry system.
Received on Monday, 9 August 2004 03:56:18 UTC