avoiding duplicates in URI registry

Details are in the minutes, which I just sent out.

It was pointed out that a registry that allows duplicates can
still help avoid them, at least if those participating have
any sense.

Please, if you're going to discuss topics mentioned in the minutes,
please start a new subject line.

Larry


> >   Tony Hansen and Ted Hardie will create a new document which
> >   replaces these, but with the idea that non-standards-track
> >   scheme registration will be much easier, with the main purpose
> >   to avoid duplicates.
> 
> There was a fair amount of disagreement about that last clause. A few 
> of us (at least Leslie Daigle and I) thought that allowing duplicates 
> but documenting the registrants of each would cause less problems for 
> the registry, and still allow legit developers to pick a good new 
> name, than trying to come up with a single-entry system.