Hello Michel, Because I haven't heard from you on this issue, I assume that you are fine with the changes I made, and so I'm closing this issue. Regards, Martin. At 07:33 04/03/30 -0500, Martin Duerst wrote: >At 00:23 04/03/19 -0800, Michel Suignard wrote: > >>Adam, I think you have a valid point, I would however make a simpler >>suggestion, which is two fold: >> >>- introduce the concept of IRI used as presentation element of URI >>protocol element. In that sense http://jose'.example.net/ is a >>presentation element for the following protocol element >>http://xn--jos-dma.example.net/ and as you noted >>http://jos%C3%A9.example.net/ is not a correct URI (per RFC 2616 >>referring to host itself defined in RFC 2396). I have suggested text in >>that sense to the IRI main editor (Martin). Having the concept of >>presentation element validates http IRIs which exist de facto, whatever >>we like it or not. > >Hello Michel, > >I have noted this as issue presentationElement-25 and have >added the text you sent me, with some changes. > >Please check it and send more comments if necessary. Otherwise, >I'd like to close this issue. > > >Regards, Martin.Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 04:35:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC