W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2004

Re: namespace names [was: Concern with URI normalization text; proposed change]

From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 00:19:36 -0400
To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040407041936.GA17685@ccil.org>

Paul Grosso scripsit:

> XML (more accurately, Namespaces in XML [1]) is not trying to say
> anything about the meaning of a URI, it defines XML namespaces.
> I am not disagreeing what those two URIs mean, but the Namespaces 
> in XML spec says:
>   An XML namespace is a collection of names, identified by a URI reference....
>   URI references which identify namespaces are considered identical when they 
>   are exactly the same character-for-character. Note that URI references which 
>   are not identical in this sense may in fact be functionally equivalent. 
>   Examples include URI references which differ only in case....

Note, however, that Namespaces does not go so far as to say that namespaces
which are not the same char-for-char are necessarily distinct.  AFAIK
all implementations treat them as distinct, but it is not actually required.

Her he asked if O'Hare Doctor tidings sent from far     John Cowan
coast and she with grameful sigh him answered that      www.ccil.org/~cowan
O'Hare Doctor in heaven was. Sad was the man that word  www.reutershealth.com
to hear that him so heavied in bowels ruthful. All      jcowan@reutershealth.com
she there told him, ruing death for friend so young,
algate sore unwilling God's rightwiseness to withsay.   Ulysses, "Oxen"
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2004 00:23:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:07 UTC