Re: grammar fix for path

At 13:12 06/04/04 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>Assuming that the body text production (using hier-part) is correct 
>>(which I think it is) then the 'path' production is itself not used 
>>anywhere, hence redundant.
>
>You are missing the whole point of having it.

OK, I was taking a narrow functional view of the grammar for this exercise.

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact

Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2004 04:23:46 UTC