W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > February 2003

Re: RFC2396bis, qualified, a nit

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:56:45 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030227215538.03be0670@127.0.0.1>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
Cc: <uri@w3.org>

At 10:37 PM 2/26/03 -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>Looking at this raises another test case for consideration
>>
>>   http://example.123./aaa/bbb#ccc
>>
>>is this a relative URI or an invalid URI?  I think the syntax says it's 
>>relative.
>
>How could that be?  It begins with a scheme name, and therefore can't
>be relative.  It is invalid.

I have to agree.  I'm not sure what I was thinking of, but my new parser 
which is built very closely on the syntax in your doc says it's invalid.

(Thanks for the other responses.  I was just checking.)

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 05:13:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:31 GMT