> I think the syntax production 'qualified' is ambiguous (i.e. permits > more than one parse tree for some valid values). Yep. Theoretically speaking it matches the way BIND works, but I agree that it is better for parsers as > qualified = *( "." domainlabel ) [ "." toplabel "." ] Added to the list as 038-qualified. Thanks. > Looking at this raises another test case for consideration > > http://example.123./aaa/bbb#ccc > > is this a relative URI or an invalid URI? I think the syntax says > it's relative. How could that be? It begins with a scheme name, and therefore can't be relative. It is invalid. ....RoyReceived on Thursday, 27 February 2003 04:16:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:11:43 GMT