W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > May 2002

Re: update RFC 2396

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 10:53:36 -0700
Cc: uri@w3.org, timbl@w3.org ('Tim Berners-Lee'), LMM@acm.org
To: hardie@oakthorn.com
Message-Id: <5C55F5C6-5D2C-11D6-BD02-000393753936@apache.org>
My opinion is that only 1% of that work requires a normative change
to the standard, and that is simply establishing a default encoding
for on-the-wire URI (the one currently being used by most Web browsers).
The rest is UI recommendations, which are being developed by the W3C.

I do not believe in having two different definitions of the same
protocol element floating around on the standards track.


On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 10:42  AM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> 	The IRI work looks to be extensive enough to require its own
> discussion and progress through the standards process; I don't see
> that as something that would fit in an update for something recycling
> at Draft standard.  Or is there some (smaller)piece of it that you see
> incorporating here prior to going through that process?
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2002 14:38:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:04 UTC