W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > May 2002

Re: update RFC 2396

From: Ted Hardie <hardie@oakthorn.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200205011742.KAA25331@geode.he.net>
To: fielding@apache.org (Roy T. Fielding)
Cc: uri@w3.org, timbl@w3.org ('Tim Berners-Lee'), LMM@acm.org
	The IRI work looks to be extensive enough to require its own
discussion and progress through the standards process; I don't see
that as something that would fit in an update for something recycling
at Draft standard.  Or is there some (smaller)piece of it that you see
incorporating here prior to going through that process?
				Ted Hardie

> On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 10:08  PM, Larry Masinter wrote:
> > I'm getting some pressure to update RFC 2396, if only
> > to incorporate RFC 2732 (the IPv6 modifications) and
> > related errata. (Well, to be honest, I'm getting pressure
> > to update RFC 2732, but I'd rather just incorporate the
> > change in an updated 2396).
> Me too.  I'd also like to incorporate the relevant bits from IRI,
> since there are now more UTF-8 assuming implementations than
> any other specific character encoding.
> Shall we shift over to the XML format for drafts?
> ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2002 13:42:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:30 GMT