W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2002

Re: FYI: 'sms' scheme proposal

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 14:07:00 -0800
Cc: uri@w3.org
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9E83D322-49AA-11D6-9E19-000A27836A68@mnot.net>

 From what I can tell, this is that draft with perhaps some small 
changes, and an added author.

I'd like to see telephone-based URIs use the form proposed [1] by TBL; 
it's a much better integration with URIs. Unfortunately, because tel and 
fax are already out there, I doubt this will happen.

Another issue that I've brought up with the author is their use of a 
parameter to communicate the body; it would be better to follow in 
mailto's footsteps here and use a query arg, IMHO.

1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Axioms.html#relative

On Thursday, April 4, 2002, at 08:57  PM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 14:39, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> My initial reaction to the draft [1] was 'use tel', but the arguments
>> there [2] (Section 2.7.1) seem to support using different schemes for
>> different types of endpoints (e.g., tel, fax, modem).
> Hmm... I already had an SMS URI scheme in my index...
>   http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes#gsm-sms
> but I guess it was just an I-D:
> URLs for GSM Short Message Service . Vaha-Sipila, Internet Draft issued
> 1998-12-09.
>> Besides that and the multiple resource issue, it looks in the ballpark;
>> I plan to make some comments, and thought that people here might as 
>> well.
>> 1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wilde-sms-uri-02.txt
>> 2. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2806.txt
Mark Nottingham
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2002 17:07:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:04 UTC