W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > April 2002

Re: FYI: 'sms' scheme proposal

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: 04 Apr 2002 22:57:47 -0600
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: uri@w3.org
Message-Id: <1017982667.22225.1.camel@dirk>
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 14:39, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> My initial reaction to the draft [1] was 'use tel', but the arguments 
> there [2] (Section 2.7.1) seem to support using different schemes for 
> different types of endpoints (e.g., tel, fax, modem).

Hmm... I already had an SMS URI scheme in my index...

  http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes#gsm-sms

but I guess it was just an I-D:

URLs for GSM Short Message Service . Vaha-Sipila, Internet Draft issued
1998-12-09.

> Besides that and the multiple resource issue, it looks in the ballpark; 
> I plan to make some comments, and thought that people here might as well.
> 
> 
> 1. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wilde-sms-uri-02.txt
> 2. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2806.txt
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 23:57:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 January 2011 12:15:30 GMT