Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995

Jim Conklin (conklin@info.cren.net)
Fri, 4 Aug 1995 13:03:04 +0100


Message-Id: <199508041700.NAA08824@info.cren.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 13:03:04 +0100
To: Mark Madsen <msm@ansa.co.uk>
From: conklin@info.cren.net (Jim Conklin)
Subject: Re: Minutes of the URI WG meeting of 18 July 1995
Cc: minutes@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, uri@bunyip.com, msm@ansa.co.uk,

At  9:44 AM 8/4/95 +0100, Mark Madsen wrote:
>Jim Conklin wrote:
> ...
>> a.  WG action on the URN syntax drafts should be moved ahead and
>> accomplished by (1) an interim report comparing the various URN
>> proposals (based on work already distributed to the WG) and recommending
>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Would somebody clarify for me whether this refers to the draft I
>circulated to the URI list the week before the Stockholm meeting? ...

Mark,
  I believe that's the case, but I confess that my memory is now fuzzy.
  With the close of the WG, this and all other continuing UR* work will now
have to proceed in one of the new UR* WG's resulting from the UR-NG BOF.

Jim