- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 22:40:19 -0500
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
On 02/19/2017 09:53 PM, Michael Cooper wrote: > For me keeping the concept of editors' notes separate from regular notes is important. > > Regular notes are interpretive guidance about the spec features. > > Editors' notes are statements about the production of the spec, such as "this is incomplete", "we really want input on this", > etc. My practice is to remove editors' notes by Rec (and don't mind if Pubrules wants to enforce that), and I make sure > they're pretty minimal from CR on, but in Working Draft I use them a lot. > > I'm agnostic about the style, for me the different note header is enough but see value in a greater style differentiation. I > would not want to lose the feature from Respec. The CSSWG uses class="issue" for such notes. So the question is, is there a three-way distinction in regular use (note vs. ednote vs. issue) or just a two-way distinction (note vs. issue). ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 20 February 2017 03:40:59 UTC