W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: New TR design in 2017?

From: Tobie Langel <tobie@codespeaks.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:04:44 +0100
Message-Id: <1479830684.3650429.795946441.7F858494@webmail.messagingengine.com>
To: spec-prod@w3.org
Cc: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Antonio Olmo Titos <antonio@w3.org>, fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net
Hi all,

First, thanks so much to Fantasai whose work really helped improve the
UX of using specs this past year. <3

Secondly though, and sorry for ranting, but W3C is a standard org whose
main output is specs. That it relies on volunteering from members and IE
to improve the design of its specs is baffling. Making specs as easy to
consume as possible should be paramount.

I'd like to see W3C put more resources in areas that actually matter to
itself, its community and the Web at large. If the UX of consuming its
specs isn't one of those, then what is?



On Tue, Nov 22, 2016, at 16:38, Philippe Le Hégaret wrote:
> At the moment, we don't have a designated point person to propose a new 
> design for W3C specifications in 2017. Some proposals are however 
> interesting, eg 108. Antonio is looking into it.
> If you're interested in driving a proposal for the next W3C TR design, 
> please let me know.
> Philippe
> https://github.com/w3c/tr-design/issues/108
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:05:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 November 2016 16:05:18 UTC