W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: Spec authoring tools

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:36:25 +0100
Message-ID: <548B1989.4010301@w3.org>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Hi,

On 12/12/2014 17:14 , Tobie Langel wrote:
> I'm currently doing some work that involves parsing specs to gather some
> of their content.
>
> Given that there's pretty much no standard for how specs are structured,
> I'm mostly forced to branch per spec authoring tool.
>
> Right now, I've identified Respec (drafts and rendered), Bikeshed and
> Anolis. Am I missing any?

In addition to those that Tab mentioned there's also XMLSpec. It's still 
used a fair bit, but if you're sticking to "Web" specs you should be in 
the clear.

Then there are crazy people like Web Driver who handcraft their specs.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 16:36:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:21 UTC