W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: Definitions, references, and tooltips

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 11:39:07 +0100
Message-ID: <546338CB.4090100@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Tobie Langel <tobie.langel@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 11/11/2014 19:13 , Shane McCarron wrote:
> Yes - I am aware of what Bikeshed uses as its source form.  In the case
> of ReSpec, I am more inclined to use the Bikeshed "output" form of the
> attributes as the source form.  I could be persuaded to change my mind.

As a rule of thumb I don't see the value in requiring people to type 
data- prefixes in something that is a source document. It is meant to be 
easy to edit, not to conform to anything. Making it valid is the 
processor's job.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 10:39:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:21 UTC