W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Spec Restyling Proposal

From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:46:37 +0800
Message-ID: <4F794B4D.6000502@csail.mit.edu>
To: Spec Discussions <spec-prod@w3.org>
I'm late to this party, but I rebuilt this

(12/04/02 6:37), fantasai wrote:
> Futuristic Look
>   In keeping with W3C's mission to "lead the Web to its full potential",
>   we wanted to emphasize that W3C is creating the Future of the Web.
>   To show that, we chose a deep space background, which gives the design
>   its futuristic feel.

with 58 radial-gradients[1] to .... celebrate css3-images' advancing
into CR with the editors I guess :p

I tried to incorporate[2] that into our WCAG-friendly new style, but it
doesn't work quite well:

* IE9 and Firefox 11[3] don't support explicit length as gradient radii.
* Chromuim18 and Opera12alpha can display it, but the scrolling isn't
quite smooth. (There are 58 backgrounds, what can I expect? We probably
want to get cross-fade() specced sooner :)

I don't know what is the licence of the original background, my
derivative work is on Public Domain. Feel free to use it as some kind of
stress test!

> Passion and Creativity
>   People have the impression that creating specs at W3C is a boring,
>   beaureaucratic, process-laden process.

s/have the impression that creating specs//
s/is a boring/are crazy/

I can't believe spent at least an our just to plot the stars.... I guess
this proves that the gradient syntax is indeed human writable (I was
writing the prefixed version, though).

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Apr/att-0001/spacebg
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Apr/att-0001/css3-images
[3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627885


Cheers,
Kenny
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 06:47:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 2 April 2012 06:47:09 GMT