W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: References Re: What are the requirements/problems? Re: Working on New Styles for W3C Specifications

From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:32:57 +0100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: chairs@w3.org, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <201112141632.58181.bert@w3.org>
On Wednesday 14 December 2011 15:25:42 Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-12-14 14:48, Bert Bos wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 December 2011 01:37:08 Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> >> Apart from that, I have to say I'm also not happy with that RDF,
> >> but my main reason is that the order of the authors gets garbled.
> > 
> > Yes, that bothered me enough that some time ago I stopped using the
> > RDF file[1] for the spec postprocessor[2] and instead get the data
> > directly from the source: the HTML files on /TR. The result is
> > added, as before, to a Refer database[3], which also contains
> > other, non-W3C publications that people have needed to cite. (But
> > those other references are purely maintained by hand. I haven't
> > coupled it with the RFC database[4], e.g.).
> > ...
> 
> Bert,
> 
> any chance you could generate a simple XML file that contains ordered
> author lists per entry in tr.rdf?

That shouldn't be hard: it's the same data as in the Refer file, only 
with different delimiters...

Just any XML format? Or did you have a specific one in mind?



Bert
-- 
  Bert Bos                                ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/
  http://www.w3.org/people/bos                               W3C/ERCIM
  bert@w3.org                             2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93
  +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92            06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 15:35:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:18 GMT