W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Language Binding License

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:51:37 -0500
Message-ID: <4B7C3AB9.1080706@w3.org>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
CC: spec-prod@w3.org, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Hi, Robin-

Those are questions for PLH, now CCed.

Robin Berjon wrote (on 2/17/10 8:55 AM):
> On Feb 17, 2010, at 04:07 , Doug Schepers wrote:
>> Philippe Le Hégaret has just updated the W3C Guide to suggest
>> licensing wording for specifications that include APIs or
>> bindings:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/Guide/binding-license.html
>>
>> This may be useful for editors who use include language bindings
>> directly in the body of specifications.  For convenience, you may
>> still wish to provide the raw bindings in a separate file, but it
>> makes sense to have the bindings in the document be under the same
>> reusable license (rather than the more restrictive document
>> license).
>
> The solution that the DOM uses relies on placing specific text in an
> external document. If we were to use similar text inside a
> single-page specification are there guidelines as to where we ought
> to place it? SotD? Alongside the © notice?
>

-- 
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 18:51:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:16 GMT