- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:51:37 -0500
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Hi, Robin- Those are questions for PLH, now CCed. Robin Berjon wrote (on 2/17/10 8:55 AM): > On Feb 17, 2010, at 04:07 , Doug Schepers wrote: >> Philippe Le Hégaret has just updated the W3C Guide to suggest >> licensing wording for specifications that include APIs or >> bindings: >> >> http://www.w3.org/Guide/binding-license.html >> >> This may be useful for editors who use include language bindings >> directly in the body of specifications. For convenience, you may >> still wish to provide the raw bindings in a separate file, but it >> makes sense to have the bindings in the document be under the same >> reusable license (rather than the more restrictive document >> license). > > The solution that the DOM uses relies on placing specific text in an > external document. If we were to use similar text inside a > single-page specification are there guidelines as to where we ought > to place it? SotD? Alongside the © notice? > -- Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 18:51:39 UTC