- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:55:19 +0100
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: spec-prod@w3.org
On Feb 17, 2010, at 04:07 , Doug Schepers wrote: > Philippe Le Hégaret has just updated the W3C Guide to suggest licensing wording for specifications that include APIs or bindings: > > http://www.w3.org/Guide/binding-license.html > > This may be useful for editors who use include language bindings directly in the body of specifications. For convenience, you may still wish to provide the raw bindings in a separate file, but it makes sense to have the bindings in the document be under the same reusable license (rather than the more restrictive document license). The solution that the DOM uses relies on placing specific text in an external document. If we were to use similar text inside a single-page specification are there guidelines as to where we ought to place it? SotD? Alongside the © notice? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 13:55:57 UTC