W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: [ReSpec] dated versions of works in progress

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 10:38:38 -0500
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Message-Id: <2E654C4E-F930-45CA-9F2E-7D60275FCD50@w3.org>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>

On 18 May 2010, at 10:28 AM, Robin Berjon wrote:

> On May 18, 2010, at 15:22 , Dan Connolly wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 11:45 +0200, Robin Berjon wrote:
>>> Well, the primary reason is that, as usual, tools are perfectly  
>>> well hidden deep inside dated space so that they can't ever be  
>>> found :)
>>
>> It is indeed frustrating that the recent redesign clipped some
>> links/paths from the tech reports page to the tool,
>> but I don't think "dated space" has much to do with findability.
>
> In this case, indeed not, but if one can't complain about dated  
> space also in bad faith then is life really worth living?
>
>> It's the top search hit for "bibliography generator" on our site
>> (or "w3c bibliography generator" on your favorite search engine).
>> That does require knowing it exists.
>
> Yup. I searched for various things (I think "bibliography database"  
> might have been one of them) when I was looking into this but I  
> didn't stumble upon this tool. Is there a master list of all tools?  
> I would find that quite useful (but I'm guessing that there's no way  
> to automate the generation of such a list).

The editor's home page has a list:
  http://www.w3.org/2003/Editors/

Linked from the Guidebook.
  http://www.w3.org/Guide/

  _ Ian


--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)    http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel:                                      +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:38:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:17 GMT