W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ReSpec.js and diff marking

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:14:50 -0500
Message-ID: <4BC870DA.9000502@aptest.com>
To: Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
No - it's the same script.  I didn't push the update into that 
repository yet.  There are a number of bugs fixed, but there is still 
something weird about how it interacts with ReSpec.js that I am trying 
to run down.  I will keep you posted.

W.r.t. ReSpec.js and the default engine, I don't mind if it is on my 
server or yours.  My server is a massive machine at DreamHost that has 
unlimited storage, bandwidth, CPU, etc... so I am happy to leave it 
there rather than burden the W3C servers any more than they already are.

I will keep you posted!

Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Hi Shane,
>
> Le vendredi 16 avril 2010 à 08:38 -0500, Shane McCarron a écrit :
>   
>>> Ideally, for simplicity's sake, it would be nice if ReSpec came out
>>> of the box with a default URI for such diffs. I understand if you'd
>>> rather we didn't use the one at your site. There's one carefully
>>> hidden in datedspace at http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff (see
>>> http://esw.w3.org/HtmlDiff for a list).
>>>   
>>>       
>> I dont mind hardcoding mine.  Mine is on a server with lots of spare
>> cycles and I have fixed some bugs in it.  The one at that date space
>> location won't work with ReSpec.js as is.
>>     
>
> I would be happy to update the script behind
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff if you have a new version that would
> handle ReSpec better. I didn't see an update in your CVS repository:
> http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/htmldiff/htmldiff so
> maybe this is an entirely different script?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dom
>
>
>
>   
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 14:15:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:17 GMT