W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: ReSpec.js and pubrules

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:16:09 +0200
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Spec Prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C0CBD950-15C0-4097-AB2F-A57C10E89432@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
The webmaster seems to have let this particular validation problem through.  Repeatedly.
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







On 15 Apr 2010, at 17:13, Shane McCarron wrote:

> Obviously, one of our goals with ReSpec.js is to ensure that generated documents pass pubrules.  I have made a few changes to help with this, but today I noticed that the respec.css file does not validate.  I don't think Pubs will permit us to use a CSS file that doesn't validate.  Ideas?
> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:16:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:17 GMT