W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: "this version" link on manual of style should be "latest version"

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:06:57 -0500
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
Message-Id: <1155233217.17437.1.camel@jebediah>
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:49 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:41 -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:27 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > 
> > > [1] section "Document Identifiers" of pubrules,
> > > which doesn't seem to have a handy fragment to refer to.
> > > http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=filter&uri=
> > > 
> > > It's not very explicit about what "this version" means.
> > 
> > See:
> >  http://www.w3.org/TR/#versioning
> 
> Ah; I didn't think to look there.
> 
> > That's on the TR page for people who come to read specs. I don't know
> > whether that info is better there or somewhere in pubrules. If left
> > where it is, it's useful to link to it from pubrules,
> 
> yes, please. And from http://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions , perhaps.
> And maybe from http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri ... and that

Added to both.

> reminds me of http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI , which is another
> place to consider adding a link.

Not added; I'm not ready to look at that document closely.

 _ Ian

> >  which I don't
> > believe is currently the case. 
> > 
> > DanC, do you have a preference?
> 
> Where it is makes sense to me.
> 
>  
-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 18:07:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:13 GMT