On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:41 -0500, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:27 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > [1] section "Document Identifiers" of pubrules, > > which doesn't seem to have a handy fragment to refer to. > > http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=filter&uri= > > > > It's not very explicit about what "this version" means. > > See: > http://www.w3.org/TR/#versioning Ah; I didn't think to look there. > That's on the TR page for people who come to read specs. I don't know > whether that info is better there or somewhere in pubrules. If left > where it is, it's useful to link to it from pubrules, yes, please. And from http://www.w3.org/2005/05/tr-versions , perhaps. And maybe from http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri ... and that reminds me of http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI , which is another place to consider adding a link. > which I don't > believe is currently the case. > > DanC, do you have a preference? Where it is makes sense to me. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Thursday, 10 August 2006 17:50:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:13 GMT