W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Square-bracket output of Definition in specs is bogus

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:20:28 -0800
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, spec-prod@w3.org
Message-id: <BF913E17-496F-11D9-B7D9-000A95A51C9E@textuality.com>

On Dec 8, 2004, at 3:06 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> So does any other mark-up, such as boxes or glossaries or sections
> (as in the IEEE example I sent), but the others leave the in-line text
> as-is (making just the term bold) so that they do not interfere with
> the text surrounding the definition -- the definitions are then 
> collected
> and repeated automatically in a box, glossary, or Definitions section.

Speaking as the <blush> inventor of the current typographical usage, I 
think Roy's right. -Tim
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2004 23:20:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:42:17 UTC