W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2001

Errata link in specs [was: Re: Use of pronouns in style doc]

From: <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 23:24:54 +0100
Message-ID: <T569f14a998c407b7069dc@reuters.com>
To: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>, janet@w3.org, spec-prod@w3.org
Cc: i18n-editor@w3.org

On 13/10/2001 09:06:20 Susan Lesch wrote:
[...]
> Richard Ishida wrote:
[...]

> Thanks very much for your comments. (The errata link idea in your third
> message is great and I hope you get some more replies about it.)

Susan was referring to Richard's mail:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2001OctDec/0002

| I can't help thinking that the link to the errata page is often a little
| hidden at the bottom of the status section, and yet the errata may contain
| important information.  Would it make sense to include it in the document
| identification in a similar style to 'This version:" and 'Latest version:' ?

The chairs list is silent on this sensible proposal.  How do we
progress it?

Misha






-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Monday, 15 October 2001 18:22:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:11 GMT