- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 07:12:24 -0700
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@east.sun.com>, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, <spec-prod@w3.org>
Gee, I must be spacing out. I looked at the Schema recs specifically as an example and noticed incorrect copyright information (in both HTML and XML.) But when I check today everything seems fine. I must have been seeing a mirage - sorry to cast unfounded aspersions your way! > -----Original Message----- > From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:16 AM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: Norman Walsh; Dominique Hazael-Massieux; spec-prod@w3.org > Subject: Re: Copyright issue > > "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> writes: > > > 3) the xmlspec.xsl boilerplate is obsolete. This means lots of specs > > (most notably the XML Schema recs) have obsolete copyrights in them. > > I agree that the XML version of the XML Schema REC lacks a copyright > statement, but the HTML version is correct, I believe -- at least it's > identical to yours in XInclude. What do you think is wrong? (I did > update my copy of xmlspec.xsl to bring it up-to-date fairly recently, > you see.) > > ht > -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of > Edinburgh > W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 12:15:45 UTC