W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Copyright issue

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 07:12:24 -0700
Message-ID: <330564469BFEC046B84E591EB3D4D59CDA91D7@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@east.sun.com>, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, <spec-prod@w3.org>
Gee, I must be spacing out.  I looked at the Schema recs specifically as
an example and noticed incorrect copyright information (in both HTML and
XML.)  But when I check today everything seems fine.  I must have been
seeing a mirage - sorry to cast unfounded aspersions your way!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:16 AM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: Norman Walsh; Dominique Hazael-Massieux; spec-prod@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Copyright issue
> 
> "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com> writes:
> 
> > 3) the xmlspec.xsl boilerplate is obsolete.  This means lots of
specs
> > (most notably the XML Schema recs) have obsolete copyrights in them.
> 
> I agree that the XML version of the XML Schema REC lacks a copyright
> statement, but the HTML version is correct, I believe -- at least it's
> identical to yours in XInclude.  What do you think is wrong?  (I did
> update my copy of xmlspec.xsl to bring it up-to-date fairly recently,
> you see.)
> 
> ht
> --
>   Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of
> Edinburgh
>           W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
>      2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131
650-4440
> 	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
> 		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 12:15:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:11 GMT