- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 18:14:39 -0500
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- CC: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
[...]
> I agree with you about extensibility. (A digression - it would be nice if
> class values could be URIs and we could use RDF to describe them and have
> some hope of extneding in a way that we could keep track of,
Great minds think alike! See:
"using grounded HTML link relationships, grounded class
names as semantic hooks "
http://www.w3.org/2000/07/hs78/#link
and an example
http://www.w3.org/2000/07/hs78/algernon
was finishing the documentation, but gotta go now.
> but that breaks
> CSS in many cases,
yes, but I found a way to do it that's pretty clean.
take a look at style.css in /hs78/
> unless we want to fill things with escaped character, and
> I don't.)
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 21 July 2000 19:14:44 UTC