W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 1999

Re: Allow scraps/productions without titles?

From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 07:57:21 +0700
Message-ID: <371144F1.D46C113A@jclark.com>
To: spec-prod@w3.org
The reason I requested this is I often have only one scrap in the div,
and so the scrap head just ends up duplicating the div head, which is
pointless and looks silly (I cheat by having empty head elements at the
moment).

"Eve L. Maler" wrote:
> 
> James Clark has requested that the required title on the scrap element in
> the XMLspec DTD be relaxed to "optional" status.  I felt that there is too
> much value in keeping it titled, because then stylesheets can continue to
> reliably generated (for example) Tables of Productions, and specrefs to
> scraps will continue to work.
> 
> However, I suggested that prod could be allowed directly inside section
> content, and James thought this would work.  He also pointed out that
> prodgroup could be allowed directly.
> 
> My question to the XMLspec-using community: Is everyone okay with my adding
> prod and prodgroup to %illus.class;, so that they'll be allowed in all the
> same places as scrap, and people can choose whether to have "formal" or
> "informal" productions/groups?  If so, I'll be making this change in the
> next couple of weeks, at the same time as I make some other requested
> changes and fixes.
> 
>         Eve
Received on Sunday, 11 April 1999 21:22:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 March 2012 06:19:09 GMT